Sunday, May 27, 2012

Current Insurance Policies Fall Short of Health Care Reform

While we await the ruling of the  supposedly non-partisan Supreme Court on the legality of  the Affordable Care Act (aka: Obamacare, health care reform) it is useful to know one thing that would change if it goes through.  More than 11 million Americans are currently covered by private individual insurance plans that would not meet the minimum standards of coverage with ACA.  The big insurance companies would have to improve their plan offerings value if ACA goes into effect.

A study by Health Affairs showed that 51% of current policies had an actuarial value of less than 60% which would put it below the minimum requirements established under the Affordable Care Act for future state-based exchanges.  Those exchanges are scheduled to begin by 2014.

It is exorbitantly costly to be self insured and consumers are often stuck with what they can get.  The idea of "competition" and choice is a myth.  The individual insurance design falls short of what most people think they are buying when they pay premiums.  Five thousand dollar deductibles are common and exclusions for prior conditions like sinusitis or benign breast lumps are standard.  If a woman had a benign lump removed in her 20s, it is likely there would be an exclusion for breast disease that might occur when she is 55.  The more conditions that can be excluded, the better it is for underwriting and it completely negates the benefit of having insurance at all.

The purpose of the Affordable Care Act is to protect more Americans by getting them coverage that is truly a benefit.  It is not perfect.  There are many parts that will be tweaked and changed by Congress as it goes forward, just like any piece of legislation.  But it is a start at rectifying the abuses that millions of Americans have had to swallow.

Lets see what the Supreme Court decides.

Saturday, May 26, 2012

High Health Cost Does Not Guarantee Quality

The new buzzword in Medicine these days is "value based purchasing".  It's not a new concept...everyone wants to get their moneys worth, whether it is a new car, a meal at a fancy restaurant or the best medical care.  Without clear information on quality,  however, many patients assume that more expensive care is better care.

The Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHCRQ) has funded a study to look at this.  A team of researchers studied how various presentations of cost and quality influenced the choices of patients.  They found that many people perceived low cost clinicians to be substandard and avoided them.  It didn't matter if they were paying out of pocket for care or if they had insurance that covered the service.  They still associated higher cost with higher quality care.

When patients were given information in the form of easy to understand data about care quality they were more likely to make choices that didn't cost more.  It mattered how the data was presented.

Americans spend more on their health care than citizens of 12 other developed nations, but the quality of that care (as measured in outcomes, accessibility, preventive care) lags far behind.  It is difficult for a patient to know what "quality" care is.  According to Peter Lee, the former chief executive of the Pacific Business Group on Health, "For most consumers, the fact that there is no connection between quality and cost is one of the dirty secrets of medicine."

Most people don't have the time or expertise to delve into finding out if their doctor, hospital or surgeon can deliver "value" for the cost.  There are a number of websites that compare hospital outcomes for surgeries, infections and treatments but they are cumbersome and the data can be 2 or more years old.  Essentially they are useless for the patient.

Until we can:
1.  Define quality
2.  Provide transparent data that is easy to understand and
3.  Provide pricing and costs that are easy to understand

we will never be able to bring the escalating cost of health care under control.  Until that time, patients are flying blind and hoping that their high cost care delivers something in return that they can value.
 


Tuesday, May 22, 2012

PSA Tests Not Advised

A top panel of health experts, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has issued their ruling that prostate specific antigen (PSA) tests should not be done as a screening test on any man.  This is after several years of controversy about the blood test that many men get routinely at their annual physical exam.  The task force said the test leads to treatments that do more harm than good...in medical terms we say the risks outweigh the benefits.

This ruling sparked an outcry from the American Urologic Association, who said the recommendation was "inappropriate and irresponsible".  Keep in mind that the urologists are the specialty that benefits from biopsies and other imaging tests that are needed to confirm whether a PSA is a "true positive" or a ""false positive".  The Association recommends annual PSA tests for men over the age of 40.

The American Cancer Society's chief medical officer, Dr. Otis Brawley, said he agreed with the Task Force recommendations.  We can expect there to be continued controversy about PSA screening now that this ruling has been issued as the various specialties issue their own response.

Like many tests, the PSA has such a high false positive rate, it has proven to be a poor screening test for healthy men.   Unfortunately, like the Ca-125 test  for ovarian cancer, there is not a good alternative screening test.

 It should be noted that there is a difference between a screening test that is done routinely on healthy patients and a diagnostic test that is performed on high-risk people or to follow known disease.  African American men have a much higher rate of aggressive prostate cancer and men in high risk groups may get higher benefit from these tests.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer diagnosed in men. The American Cancer Society estimates that 241,740 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer this year, with 28,170 expected to die from it.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Stop The Choking Game

A few weeks ago I did a post on "The Choking Game" and I have received a number of comments and emails about it.  Some of the stories are so sad...grieving parents who lost vibrant kids to this crazy game.  Children have no idea of the dangers involved and there is a lack of awareness even among educators and parents.

I was contacted by a woman who is raising money to attend and exhibit at the National PTA Convention, which will be held in San Jose in June.  The goal is to raise awareness about the Choking Game.  I hope readers will see how important this cause is.

Please go to this link and donate a little if you can so these parents can help educators know that knowledge is power and kids need to be informed.   The video on the site is too shocking to put on EverythingHealth.  I could hardly watch it to the end.  A light needs to be shined on this practice and hopefully parents, teachers and principals will understand that informing kids about the game will not increase its use...it may save lives.


Thursday, May 10, 2012

Sharing Blog Posts

EverythingHealth gets many requests from other publications and blogs around the world to write health articles for them.  When it is an established site, I allow them to re-print some of my past posts to better educate the public and spread the word about health.  If you missed the post on Oseoarthritis, one of the most common conditions of mankind, please check out here:

Consultant 360

And thanks again to MR for the great photo of her hands.



Sunday, April 29, 2012

Aging skin bruising

It is not uncommon for a friend or relative to corner me with a worried look on his face and ask me about bruising on the arms or legs.  It is one of the more common concerns of patients in the office too.  People are worried that it is a harbinger of leukemia or some other blood disorder.  "Look at my skin.  These spots just appear for no reason.  What are they?"

What I'm seeing is the natural effect of aging and sun damaged skin.  The medical term is "Senile Purpura"...a term I actually hate and pronounce "sanili purpura"  just to make it sound better for patients.   It is simply easy bruising that shows through thin dermis.  Many people are taking aspirin or blood thinners that make the capillaries fragile.  Couple that with the lack of subcutaneous fat and elasticity that occurs with aging and you have purplish bruises that look positively frightful.  These bruises usually appear on the forearms or backs of the hands and shins.

There is no treatment for senile purpura.  It is not a marker for any serious disorder.  There have been some studies that show over-the-counter arnica montana ointment can help clear the reddish appearance faster.

It is never too late to protect the skin from damaging effects of the sun.  Giving arnica montana gel or capsules a try might help too.  Let me know if it does.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Sunday, April 22, 2012

The Dangerous Choking Game

There is a game that pre-teens are playing that has killed 82 kids since 1995, according the the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).    It is called the "choking game" and these youngsters have no idea how dangerous it is.  There are probably thousands of choking deaths all across the country that have not been reported to the CDC and countless parents who think their child committed suicide, when he might have just unknowingly been playing a game.

The choking game is not new at all.  I know about the choking game because I played it with my girlfriends as a kid too.  I hadn't thought about it for decades and we had no clue that it was dangerous and just thought we were having fun.  At a slumber party (now called a "sleep-over") one girl would hyperventilate for a few minutes and then hold her breath while another squeezed her from behind across her chest in a tight bear hug.  Within a few seconds she would black out completely and fall to the floor. 

I can't tell you now why we liked playing this game or what the motivation was.  I remember the sensation of waking up from a "faint" was unique and weird and maybe it was our safe way to get "high"...long before alcohol came on the scene.  Of course now as an adult,  and with knowledge of physiology, it is obvious that this game is dangerous and deadly.

The choking game deprives the brain of oxygen and a person becomes unconscious within a few seconds.  As the body slides to the floor and becomes flat, breathing resumes and the person starts to wake up.  The deaths in the choking game occurred when kids used ropes or ties to choke themselves, thinking they would wake up.   I shudder to think of how many parents might believe their child committed suicide, when they might have just been normal kids playing a deadly game.

 Parents need to be aware that this is happening and know that it could be your child too.  One study published in Pediatrics reported over 6% of middle-school kids in Portland, Oregon have tried the choking game.  This occurs at  ages between 9-15.


We cannot expect our children to know what they don't know.  Every pre-teen should be told about the dangers of breath holding and how it is really just starving brain cells of oxygen.   If you have a pre-teen or know someone who does, please send them a link to EverythingHealth or tell them about this crazy and dangerous game that should never be played.  It can be called the choking game, pass-out, black-out or fainting game.  This should be a wake-up call for parents and kids.




Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Hidden Health Care Pricing and Costs

More and more employed people who have health insurance are facing large deductibles so they are actually paying "out of pocket" for tests, Xrays and doctor visits.   Health care policy-makers talk about involving the consumer in the cost of care as a way to force competition and hold down prices.  But finding out how much something costs can be a herculean effort and take hours of time phoning around.   Despite a law in California that dates back to 2006 that requires hospitals to post common test prices, it is nearly impossible for a patient to find out ahead what something costs.

I gave my patient an order for a hip Xray to evaluate pain that would not go away.  Because she has a $5000 deductible with Anthem Blue Cross insurance, she knew that she would be paying for it.  She spent hours calling local hospitals to compare prices and became more frustrated and confused as time went on.  She was told they couldn't look it up without a code.  She was asked what hospital campus she would use for the Xray.  (implying there are different prices at the same hospital if you used a different X-ray machine)  She was placed on hold and cut off when transferred.  She was quoted a price of $745 at one hospital and $886 at another and this did not include the radiologist fee for reading the Xray.

I have advised her to call her insurance company, but I have doubts they will tell her their contracted price (which becomes her cost) in advance.

This is the reality of health care in the United States.  Even patients who have insurance struggle with decisions about cost and benefit of tests and spend hours trying to get information to make health decisions.  It is time for patients and employers who buy health insurance to stand up and demand transparency of costs.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Red Meat Linked to Death

Advanced warning: meat lovers are not going to like this. 

A well done study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine as shown that red meat consumption is linked with an increased risk of total death, cardiovascular death and cancer death.  Yup...death!  That goes further than what we knew before about red meat connection to heart attacks and strokes.  This is the big one.


This study looked at two large studies that contained 28 years of follow-up data:  The Health Professionals Follow-up Study and the Nurses' Health Study.   The researchers excluded subjects that had a history of CVD or cancer at baseline or left more than 9 study questions blank.  They ended up with 37,698 men and 83,644 women.   

They found some interesting things.  Both men and women with higher intake of red meat were less likely to be physically active and were more likely to be smokers, drink alcohol and have a higher body mass index (fat!).   Additionally, those with higher intake of meat had lower intakes of whole grains, fruits and vegetables.  Over time,  (from 1986 to 2006) the daily intake of red meat dropped.  (perhaps this was the result of public service education about the cardiovascular dangers of red meat that occurred during that time period)

This was a strong study.  Because all of the participants were professionals, their education was similar.  The study size was huge as were the years of follow-up.  But the researchers could not differentiate between "lean" meat and higher fat content meat.  They did find that bacon and hot dogs had higher risk than other types.  They found that processed meats that contain sodium and nitrates increased cardiovascular disease, cancer and death.

If one serving of total red meat was substituted with l serving of fish, poultry, nuts, legumes, low-fat dairy products or whole grains daily, there was a lower risk of total mortality.  The authors estimated that 9.3% of deaths in men and 7.6% of deaths in women could have been prevented if the participants consumed fewer than  1/2 serving per day of total red meat.

Salmon -yum
Here is the bottom line.  Eating meat is bad for the planet and bad for your body. If you can't become a vegetarian do yourself a favor and reduce your red meat intake to a few ounces a day.  Have meatless days where you substitute fish or plant based meals.  Replacement of meat with alternative healthy dietary components will lower your mortality risk.


Saturday, April 14, 2012

Lepromatous leprosy

The answer to yesterday's diagnostic challenge is #2.  Leprosy.

 Most of you were correct.  The patient's face had multiple nodular lesions that coalesced into plaques.  After 9 months of multidrug treatment the skin infiltration and weakness in the left eyelid had diminished.

Leprosy is caused by the bacterium, Mycobacterium leprae.  It is not very contagious and has a long incubation period before symptoms begin.  The lepromatous type causes large bumps and lumps and is the most severe. 

Effective medications exist to treat leprosy, which is also known as Hansen's disease.  Usually different antibiotics are used together.   It is important to diagnose the disease early so treatment can limit damage and disfigurement.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

What is the Diagnosis?


Today's diagnostic challenge is from The New England Journal of Medicine and it is pretty straight forward.  Click on the image for a better view and make your diagnosis.  Check back tomorrow for the answer.

1.  Granulomatosis with polyangitis
2.  Lepromatous leprosy
3.  Neurofibromatosis type 1
4.  Sarcoidosis
5.  Tertiary syphilis

Don't be shy.  Post your guess in the comments section.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Doc Groups Identify Unnecessary Tests

When nine prestigious Medical Specialty Groups get together and identify tests that are unnecessary and wasteful, it is time to take notice.  In a rare effort, each specialty identified 5 tests and procedures that do not add value and that may be unnecessary or overused.  In all, 45 tests and procedures were listed as part of the ABIM "Choosing Wisely" campaign, a multiyear initiative that aims to reduce the waste in medicine and increase dialog between patients and physicians. 

What are some of the 45 tests and procedures we should not do?

From The Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology:
  • IgG and a battery of IgE  and other unproven allergy skin tests.
  • Antibiotics for uncomplicated sinusitis (only .5-2% are bacterial infections)
  • Inhalant or food testing or extensive diagnostic tests for chronic itching/hives.
From the American Academy of Family Physicians:
  • Xrays or MRI scans for low back pain within the first 6 weeks. (unless exam points to red flags).
  • Dexa bone scans in women younger than 65 or men younger than 70 with no risk factors.
  • Routine EKGs in patients without symptoms.
  • Pap smears on women younger than 21 or women who have had a hysterectomy for non-cancer disease.
From The American College of Cardiology:
  • Annual cardiac stress tests as part of routine follow-up in patients without symptoms.
  • Stent placement in the non-infarct artery of patients who are stable, even if they have a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in another artery.
From The American College of Physicians:
  • Pre-op screening chest X-rays.
  • CT or MRI scans for a simple fainting spell if patient has no neurological findings on exam.
From The American College of Radiology:
  • Imaging for uncomplicated headache.
  • Routine admission Chest Xray.
  • Follow up imaging for small (under 1cm) ovarian cysts  (common and usually benign). 
From The American College of Gastroenterology:
  • Colorectal cancer screening before 10 years after normal colonoscopy.
From The American Society of Clinical Oncology:
  • PET, CT and bone scans for early prostate cancer at low risk of metastasis.
  • PET, CT and bone scans for asymptomatic patients that have been treated for breast cancer for curative intent.
These are just a few of the noted "wasteful" tests that do not provide value to patients.  Any and all of these are valuable  IF a patient has symptoms that require diagnostic testing but using them as "screening" or routine tests has no value and can actually cause harm.  Not to mention $billions of wasted health care dollars.

Some doctors do these because of habit, prior training, not keeping up with current literature,  fear of litigation or patient pressure to "do everything".  When esteemed specialty societies come out with lists like this, we should all take notice.

   Of course it is up to the individual patient and the individual physician to determine risk factors and risk/benefit of any test.  But these lists should at least stimulate the question "why" and valid reasons are necessary.


Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Doctors Coat Helps Focused Attention

A recent study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology found that wearing the white coat of a doctor caused the person to focus and pay more attention.  Wearing the white coat of a painter or other occupation didn't have the same effect.  The scientists call this enclothed cognition: the effects of clothing on cognitive processes.

The experiment was done with 58 undergraduates who wore either a white lab coat or street clothes.  Those who wore the lab coat made half as many errors on incongruity trials than those who wore regular clothes.  In a 2nd experiment, they randomly assigned 74 students to either wear a doctor's coat, wear a painter's coat or see a doctor's coat.  They were given tests for sustained attention and those who wore the doctors coat found more differences and had more heightened attention than the other two groups.  Further experiments also showed that the students who wore the doctor's coat had improvement in attention.

It appears that certain articles of clothing affect how a person behaves and what "role" they take on.  Other experiments show that if you carry a heavy clipboard, you will feel more important.  Dr. Adam Galinsky, a professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University says that women who dress in a masculine fashion during a job interview are more likely to be hired and a teaching assistant who wears formal clothes is perceived as more intelligent than one who dresses more casually.

I love this experiment.  There is an old saying that "clothes make the person".  If you dress in old, ill-fitting, shabby clothing it is hard to feel successful and confident.  This study points to the idea that it goes further than just wanting to "look nice".  Perhaps clothing really does change the psychologic state of the wearer in a way that affects behavior and skill.

Now if I can just get my teenager to stop wearing those saggy, butt drooping pants!

(hat tip to Sarah for the article tip)

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

The Supreme Court and Health Care Act

The Nation is anxiously awaiting the ruling of the Supreme Court on the Health Reform Act (Accountable Care Act..aka: Obamacare) which will be announced in June.  The 6 days of hearings were unprecedented in their partisan tone and we got a good idea of how the justices will vote.  But no-one can truly predict how it will turn out until the last minute.  Each one has already rendered a private decision and the next two months will be for counterarguments and more deliberation before the final decision.

The justices can overturn the entire law, which would nullify many important health provisions that have already taken effect.  For example, 2.5 million young adults under the age of 26 could lose insurance coverage through their parents' plans.  Patient safety improvements that are already in effect would be reversed.  Preventive care goes away and  value based purchasing has just begun under ACA and could be reversed if the act is struck down. 

The justices could strike down the individual mandate part of the law.  After all, we are a free country and no-one should be forced to buy health insurance, right?  Never mind that everyone is forced into Social Security and Medicare through payroll taxes and car insurance is mandated if you drive.  Millions of people pay into Medicare and never use the service if they die before age 65 or are Christian Scientists or just hate doctors.  No-one gets a rebate.  Never mind that Emergency rooms and physicians are REQUIRED by law to treat uninsured people in the emergency room.  No-one seems to mind about that mandate! 

If they strike the mandate, they also nullify the provision for community rating and guaranteed insurance.  There is no ACA without the mandate...something the GOP knows.  Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich were fervent supporters of the mandate before they ran for President. If the mandate is eliminated,  it's back to the status quo.

The Republicans would like to make Medicare into a voucher program.  That shifts the buck back to people who can least afford it and guarantees higher administrative costs.  It essentially dismantles Medicare.

The Accountable Care Act is simply a start.  It doesn't go far enough to reduce spiraling costs.  It does address inequalities of care and helps reign in abuses.  It is a start at shifting from "do more, despite the outcome", to focusing on value.

I support it and hope the Supreme Court does too.




Sunday, April 1, 2012

Toxic Sugar

I watched "60 Minutes" tonight and it reinforced my evolving understanding that refined sugar is toxic for the human body.  Dr Lustig, a pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF, was interviewed along with other researchers and the evidence strongly confirms just how bad sugar is for us.  We know about its contribution to obesity and diabetes, but now research shows sugar raises LDL cholesterol, the culprit in heart attacks and stroke.  To add to the "sugar is toxic" message, research also shows that certain cancers have sucrose receptors and sugar makes cancer grow.


You may be saying, "Hey, refined sugar has been around for centuries and it was never a problem before. What's the big deal now?"

 The big deal is just how much sugar and high fructose corn syrup are hidden in our foods and the vast quantities that are now consumed.

 According to Whole Health Source, in 1822, the average American ate the amount of sugar found in one 12 ounce soda every 5 days.  Now we eat that much every 7 hours. We know that candy, soda and junk food are loaded with sugar.  But did you know that crackers, yogurt, ketchup, Popsicles, low fat salad dressing, white bread and buns, and spaghetti sauce are also loaded with sugar?  In fact you have to really read the label to find a food product that does not contain sugar or high fructose corn syrup.

Here is a mind boggling fact.  Four grams of sugar equals one teaspoon.  A can of regular soda (12 oz) contains 40 grams of sugar.  That is 10 teaspoons of sugar in one soda!  The next time you are at the market, notice the rows and rows of soft drinks offered.  Most of the containers are 64 oz size!  The average male between  ages 12-29 drinks 1/2 gallon a day.

What does all of this mean?  Well for me...I'm starting a sugar free diet.  Yes, that means I am eliminating all (yes all) refined sugar from my diet.  I will eat fruits that are naturally sweetened but I'll be checking labels and if it has sugar...I'm not eating it.

I encourage all of you reading this to join me.  This will mean consciously drinking more water and having it with me where ever I go. For a sugar craving I will use Stevia natural sweetener and  fruit.  Increasing foods high in B vitamins and whole grains will also help reduce sugar craving.

I always thought I ate healthily but sugar has got to go.  Join me? 

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

What is Diabetes?

Diabetes(diabetes mellitus) is a metabolic disease where there are high levels of sugar (glucose) in a person's blood. Type 1 diabetes is caused by the pancreas not producing enough insulin and Type 2 diabetes occurs when the cells do not respond to insulin to metabolize sugar. Type 2 diabetes is more common, is often genetic,  and there is an epidemic if this type of diabetes occurring because of high obesity rates. Gestational diabetes occurs in pregnant women who do not usually have diabetes. It usually resolves with the birth of the child but must be treated because of potential harm to the fetus from elevated glucose in pregnancy.

 Diabetes affects more than 20 million Americans and is the leading cause of blindness and kidney failure.

 Many people with Type 2 diabetes do not know they have it because it develops slowly over time. Diabetes is easy to diagnose with blood tests.  If a patient has two fasting blood glucose tests over 126, the diagnosis of diabetes is confirmed.  Another test called Hemoglobin A1c confirms that the glucose has been elevated over time if the level is 6.5% or higher.   Diabetes is dangerous for the body because it affects the microvasculature (blood vessels) in the body. High Cholesterol, diabetes,and hypertension are considered a "triple threat" and greatly increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

 There are complicated interactions between organs, hormones, cells and molecules in the body that are disrupted by extra fat cells and obesity. New evidence also points to inflammation as a culprit.  Low levels of inflammation in the body activates immune cells and causes insulin resistance. New diabetic medications mimic hormones from the small intestine and allow interactions between the brain, pancreas and cells to help reduce blood sugar.  Diabetes is not a simple disorder and researchers  are learning new chemical interactions in the body that will help with effective treatment in the future.

 The main treatment for type 2 diabetes is exercise, strict diet and weight loss. Losing weight to a normal BMI can completely manage the disorder in a majority of people who are overweight.  But many people with type 2 diabetes are of normal weight and many obese people do not develop diabetes so genes play a big role in the disease.   Exercise helps lower glucose without medication and aids in weight loss.

 If you are diagnosed with diabetes or pre-diabetes is is essential to understand the disease and see a nutritionist to learn about healthy eating and diet.  There is a wealth of information about diabetes from the American Diabetes Association and a diagnosis of diabetes is so serious, full blown education and action is needed.    We physicians have been too casual in allowing people to have elevated glucose levels  because diabetes causes more deaths a year than breast cancer and AIDs combined!!!

 For more information, this website is filled with great information and tips for dealing with diabetes.

If you or a loved one is diagnosed with diabetes, get educated right away and treat it like you would treat a diagnosis of Cancer or another life-threatening disorder.  Get your treatment plan going by visiting The American Diabetes Association  and get your family and friends involved in your recovery.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

This is what gastroenteritis looks like

Good news:  It only lasts a day

Spots on the Scrotum

The answer to yesterday's Image Challenge was #2 - Fordyce's angiokeratomas.

Like many unusual medical names, the condition was first described by John Addison Fordyce in 1896.
These tiny blood vessels (capillaries) are under the superficial dermis and can be found on both men and women in the scrotum and vulva area.  They are painless and appear in the 2nd and third decade and may continue to appear as the person ages.

Fordyce's angiokeratomas should not be confused with warts, herpes or other conditions.  They are completely benign and require no treatment.

There are a number of chat rooms on-line where men are concerned about these lesions and want them removed by laser.  That can be an expensive and time consuming treatment and there is no guarantee that they will not recur. 

 The best treatment is awareness and acceptance that every body is varied and Fordyce angiokeratoma is just another appearance.

Thanks everyone for your guesses and great diagnostic acumen!

Thursday, March 22, 2012

Image Challenge

 What is the diagnosis?
 You be the doctor.  This 32 year old man wonders about the raised spots on his testicles.  They are non-tender and non itchy.  (click on the image for a close-up view)

1. Beta-galactosidase deficiency
2. Fordyce's angiokeratomas
3. Radiation dermatitis
4. Scabes
5. Varicocele

The answer will be posted tomorrow so be sure to check back.  Make your guess in the comments section.  The winner gets bragging rights.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Goal Play Leadership Lessons

My blog friend,  Paul Levy,  former CEO at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston,  was the first hospital CEO to create a blog ("Running a Hospital")  that became famous for it's honesty and look into a hospital's inner workings.  He is now embarking on the next chapter of his life with the publication of his new book," Goal Play - Leadership Lessons from the Soccer Field."   Who knew that being a soccer coach for his daughter's team would provide him with a new platform to use in communicating his wisdom?

Paul has taken his considerable leadership skills and uses his Soccer experience to show us how to communicate, handle adversity and fix problems.  One wouldn't think of soccer coaching and running a hospital as having similar issues, but Mr. Levy skillfully weaves his experiences with both and shows that leadership knows no boundaries.  It is not a book about soccer...it is a book about how to be the best leader we can be by using self examination, honesty, courage and vision.  It is about helping others be the best they can be too.

I have been a fan of Paul Levy ever since I read his "Running a Hospital" blog on the internet.  He talked openly about union strikes, quality at the hospital, patient safety and employee complaints.  I had never heard of a CEO lifting the hood to expose such things.  Yet by exposing them honestly and coming up with solutions, he improved the atmosphere and dialog about health care in a way that was quite unique.  He came to the position when the organization was in crisis and used his considerable skills to "turn it around".  He opened up an era of transparency that is slowly being embraced by others.

In Goal Play, Paul gives us a tutorial about how to "coach" and be a great leader by empowering others. He transverses the worlds of soccer and corporate medicine and shows that building a team and helping that team collaborate on a plan is the measure of success for both.

I recommend "Goal Play" for everyone who wants to improve their own effectiveness, whether it is with coaching a kid's team or improvment in the workplace.  Leaders in Medicine will find it particularly interesting to read the challenges that faced the author and will be inspired to improve their own organization. 

"Goal Play" should be on the bookshelf of anyone who leads teams of people. That is a lot of people who could benefit from reading this outstanding book.  

( click on the link to order directly or go to Amazon)

Sunday, March 18, 2012

How Doctors Get Paid

Medical economics is more confusing than "advanced derivatives" and the entire banking industry collapse.  Have you ever wondered how doctors get paid?  I will try to give a brief tutorial.  Consider it "Doctor Reimbursement 101".

First of all, all payments made by Medicare or Insurance companies are based on a weird rating called the Relative Value Scale.  A group of mainly specialty dominated physicians have been appointed to an "expert panel" called the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) and they assign value ratings to the work a physician does.  For example, the RUC might proposed that an office visit is worth 2.53 value units while placing a catheter is worth 23.5 units.   Each procedure gets a value rating and through a complicated formula these value ratings are converted to actual money $. 

 This committee meets 3 times a year and their work is secret.  Their recommendations are accepted, rejected or modified by CMS (Medicare).   Only 13% of the members of the RUC represent primary care or cognitive specialties.  The remainder, 87% are made up of specialists like urologists, radiologists, heart surgeons and anesthesiologists.  With a fixed annual budget from Medicare, how the shrinking pie is divided is decided upon by this specialty dominated committee.

Is it any wonder primary care is so grossly underpaid in the United States?

After the RUC recommends the value scale for a piece of work,  CMS assigns a dollar amount based on a complicated formula that includes location, malpractice fees and presumed office expenses.  Medicare has determined that in 2012 the fee for a routine office visit for a Medicare provider is $84.30.  The Medicare reimbursement for a hip replacement is $1,459.34.   The Medicare physician fee schedule is 1,235 pages long.  Most doctors in a specialty have no idea how much another doctor in a different specialty gets paid by Medicare.

Medicare fee schedules are important because private insurers based their payments to physicians on these fees.  Some pay percents more and some  less.  Large groups or hospital consortia  have more bargaining power with insurers than does an isolated doctor.  Consequently solo or small group practices are fast becoming dinosaurs in the U.S.  The trend for physicians to join large groups or become employees of hospitals is on a rapid upward trajectory.

A few primary care physicians have opted out of the Byzantine payment structure by going "concierge".  In this structure a patient pays an up front annual fee to cover office visits, prescription refills, phone calls and access to medical care.  The patient still needs insurance to cover tests, surgeries, medications and hospitalization but the preventive and routine visits are usually covered by the fee, as is the coordination of care.  The primary care doctor gets out of the "billing" side completely.

The fee for concierge medicine can range between $1500 - $20,000/ year.  At the higher range, the concierge physician limits his practice to a few hundred patients.

Hospital charges do not include physician charges so patients often get bills separately from the radiologist, the surgeon, the hospitalist, the emergency room physician and the anesthesiologist.  Some of them contract with your insurance company and take an assigned fee.  Some do not and the charges can be quite a shock on top of the hospital bill.

Is it any wonder that our payment scheme is unsatisfactory for both patients and doctors?


Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Electronic Health Records Don't Cut Costs

A new study was published in the Journal Health Affairs that reports computerized patient records are unlikely to cut health care costs and might encourage doctors to order more expensive tests.

Save your research dollars, Health Affairs...I could have told you that!

The electronic health record gives doctors information about the patient instantly and helps coordinate care between specialists who are on the same system.   Communication and patient safety are improved.  Some are built to allow the patient access to their test results and to even make on-line appointments with their doctors.  The EHR should create a more accurate record and allow complex data to be aggregated in a way that is understandable.  It should create a more efficient system but it will never lower the cost of health care and here is why.

The technology itself is very very expensive.  The cost to an individual doctor to install and maintain the EHR can be tens of thousands of dollars a year and  large health systems spend $billions converting from paper to electronic.  The promise of eliminating file clerks and paper pushers has been replaced with even more people to enter data, maintain and upgrade the system,  and act as scribes for the busy doctor.   Doctors are training now for the new specialty of  Medical Informatics and these young physicians will never treat patients...they will deal with data and maintenance of the digital record.  It is a booming and richly paid field.

Even the fasted, most facile physician spends more time with the EHR than she did with a paper chart.  The documentation is better  and more comprehensive, but it is not cheaper.  Different systems do not talk with each other and the lack of interoperability is costly.  Paper reports still need to be scanned into the EHR and that takes time and money and extra staff.

The EHR should eliminate duplicate ordering of tests when doctors can see what others have done.  But there is a culture in medicine where physicians don't "believe" the tests that another doctor or hospital ran.  Sounds crazy but it is true and it drives me crazy when I send the results with a patient and the consultant repeats the tests.   The second $2500 MRI or $600 round of blood panels is rampant in medicine...even when the doctor has the results of a test done that week.   (Tip: Patients should refuse a 2nd test if they just had it by a referring doctor) 

 There is nothing about digital records that would drive down the cost of ordering more and more expensive tests that are not needed.  That is where the cost is.   There is nothing that eliminates expensive, futile end of life care or reduces admissions to intensive care units for patients that will never leave the hospital alive. 

Technology can improve the practice of medicine.  We are too fragmented and inefficient and the EHR is an important step for patient safety.  Anyone who thinks it will lower costs is living on another planet.  There is ample proof that it is more expensive than a paper and pen.

 


Sunday, March 4, 2012

500 Years of Women in Art



Beautiful and a reminder of the gift of Women

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Spam Comments on EverythingHealth

Dear Readers,
I am seeing more and more comments on EverythingHealth that are not real but are simply there to drive readers to commercial webpages, advertisers or porn. 

All bloggers love comments and the dialog that goes with social media.  That is why we blog and I never delete controversial comments or criticisms.  Most commenters are respectful and very thoughtful and I learn a lot from my readers.  I read all comments and reply when warranted.

I am going to add a function to the blog where I will approve comments before they are posted.  This will allow me to delete the spams early as they are showing up on my old posts also.  We'll see how this goes!

Please comment on any subject that stirs your interest. 

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Embezzlement in Doctors Offices

I just read an article that talked about more medical practices being victims of embezzlement.  In a 2009 survey of members of the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA), 83% of 945 respondents said they had been the victim of employee theft.  I guess this means I can come out of the closet now.  I have always been ashamed that my practice of 5 Internal Medicine doctors was embezzeled by our trusted long-time book keeper.  It made me feel so stupid and I didn't know how prevalent the problem is.

Our medical practice was a small business with about 100-150 patient visits a day.   Each of us ran an individual business with shared overhead and employees.    At that time patients paid small copays of $5-20,  mostly in cash.  We thought we had good record keeping but Medical Practices are actually easy to rob from because doctors have no idea what they are getting paid for a patient visit.  The documented visit charge is seldom paid in full by the insurance company.   Partial payment arrives months later...or not at all.  Many charges are "written off" when it is clear no-one is going to pay it.  The partial payments are not standardized so a $80 visit could be paid $12.53 or $45.01 or $62.33 and there was no way to know.  The lag in payment not only kept us on the edge financially, it lent itself to fraudulent practices.

I thought I could tract accounts receivable by getting monthly reports from the bookkeeper but the holes in payment are just too big.   How can disparities between billing and collections be identified when there is no standard payment for a charge?

I tracked overhead expenses, signed all checks personally when attached to an invoice and did not use credit cards for office expenses.  I often opened my own mail and spot checked insurance payments and denials. I thought I had a handle on the business of Medicine.

All of us were working very hard and our incomes were pretty poor.  But as primary care doctors, we were used to that.  I went years without self-funding a retirement account (much to my dismay now that I'm older!)

I can't remember how we uncovered the fraud but our trusted bookkeeper, Steve, had a separate account at the bank where he was depositing money for himself.  He took the cash co-pays from all of us.  Not enough to be noticed,  but enough to add up to tens of thousands of dollars over time.  We never knew how much cash was stolen.  He also deposited insurance checks and patient checks into his own account and reconciled the books so we never saw it.  That amount totaled over $180,000 that we knew about...meaning there was much, much more that we will never be able to discover.   Why the bank allowed a business check to be deposited into his personal account we will never know.

Did we prosecute?  Yes,  but the judgment we got against him never amounted to any reimbursement.  The money was long gone.  He never served jail time and is probably out there somewhere working in another medical practice.

Embezzlement can happen to anyone in business and apparently happens frequently to doctors in private practice.  some say it cannot be prevented and given the crazy way medicine is reimbursed I would have to agree.


Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Dark Spots in Eye and Skin

I must admit, being a physician, I notice unusual skin changes where ever I go and I'm fascinated with the variety of conditions I see.

 Thanks to the Captain of our snorkeling trip in Hawaii for allowing these photos of his congenital condition called Nevus of Ota. (Originally described by Ota and Tanino in 1939). As you can see, there is a gray or blueish patch on the skin around the eye and hyperpigmentation on his sclera. This is in the distribution of the opthalmic and maxillary branches of the trigeminal nerve and consists of increased pigment producing melanocytes. Because he works in the sun, the pigmentation is probably more noticeable.

 This condition causes no problems. Ninety percent are unilateral (one side only) as is his. There is a slightly higher incidence of developing melanoma, but that is rare and it does not affect his vision. Another condition called ocular melanosis looks the same but does not involve the skin. BTW...the snorkeling and whale watching were just great.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Overuse of Cardiac Stents

One of my patients is in the hospital in another city (where he lives part of the year) after suffering a GI bleed.  He had a black stool, had lost blood, was quite anemic and experienced weakness and chest tightening before he came to the ER.   In the emergency room his Cardiologist was called and admitted him under the cardiology service.  When I called the Cardiologist to identify myself as his Internist, he told me the patient was getting a transfusion and he wanted to do an angiogram to see if his prior stents were open and possibly put in more stents. 


What?  Stop right there.

The patient has chronic renal failure,  has low blood counts, was quite stable with no symptoms, was receiving a transfusion and the cardiologist wants to put in stents?  There are so many things wrong with this story I wanted to scream.

First of all, the workup should first zero in on the GI tract and find out why the patient had lost blood.  He was not experiencing any chest pain or tightness once he received blood and was feeling quite normal.  The cardiologist didn't even seem to be considering what the cause of the anemia was and had not called in a GI consultant.  Additionally, with compromised kidney function, an angiogram could put him into acute renal failure:

"Contrast nephropathy is a recognized complication after coronary angiography and intervention that has been associated with prolonged hospitalization and adverse clinical outcomes," write lead study author Jay Kay, MBBS, MRCP, from the University of Hong Kong in Aberdeen, and colleagues.

 Not only was the workup and plan completely wrong, but I wanted to ask the cardiologist if he was even aware of the COURAGE study that has rocked the medical world.  This large trial was published in The New England Journal of Medicine and presented at the 2007 Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology.  The results showed there was no difference in the outcome (death or new non fatal heart attack) between patients with stable angina who received cardiac stents and those who did not.

Every patient is different and large trials like COURAGE give us information with which to make decisions.  Most patients think stents save their lives.  Most patients have never heard of these trials and still depend upon their physician to make the decision about what is needed.     In this case, the Cardiologist was making a really bad decision for my patient.

As the Internist, I am looking at the entire picture and trying to be the quarterback.  I respect the roles of the receiver, the half back and the guards but each of them are looking only at one part of the play, while I am viewing the entire field.  In this case a patient with a GI bleed (later found to be an ulcer), no signs of unstable angina and chronic renal failure should NOT have an angiogram or any invasive cardiac procedure.

I advised my patient to "just say no".  When he did, the Cardiologist replied, "Don't blame me if you go home tomorrow and have a heart attack."

Just jaw dropping!

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Blogger Break

 EverythingHealth will be taking our own advice and renewing the spirit and soul for the next week. 

Check out the links on the right side for great blog reading and be sure to check back for more exciting health news in a week.  Aloha!

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Avoid Obesity and Let Babies Eat With Their Hands

Babies who feed themselves with their fingers chose less sugar and were less likely to become obese than spoon fed babies, according to a study in the British Medical Journal Open.  It was a small study based on recollection, but the findings were still interesting and give us clues about how children self regulate food.

When babies start eating solid food, parents often offer sweetened baby food or little sweet "treats", thinking babies will prefer that.  In fact, the babies who self fed chose carbohydrates like toast, pasta or potatoes and the spoon fed babies went for sweets when given a choice.

Parents worry about  providing a balanced diet and also worry if a child is eating too much of one item.  Studies show, however, that self feeding babies will actually take care of their own nutrition if all options are provided like fruits, vegetables, proteins, and iron rich foods like hard-boiled eggs or strips of meat.  Pureed baby food is often filled with added sugar and salt and processed baby food is a modern invention.   There is no need to prepare special food for toddlers and they do better just eating what the family eats.

In many parts of the world everyone uses their fingers to eat.  Allowing a baby to self feed doesn't mean she won't develop good Western table manners.   As a child develops and sees her family using utensils, she will automatically try to copy  and will learn to use a fork and spoon.

This small study should give moms and dads the freedom to let junior get messy eating.

Friday, February 10, 2012

First Aid for Car Crashes

A big crash happened right in front of me today while I was at a stop light.  The sound of crunching metal and screeching brakes is truly frightening and it was clear help would be needed.  I crossed the intersection and parked my car and ran across the street to see if I could help.  Surprisingly, the man driving the car that was hit was not hurt.  The young woman in the car that struck him was on the side of the road sitting on the curb and profusely bleeding from her nose and face.   She appeared to be in shock.

What do you do in a situation like this?  The first thing to do as a first responder is to keep calm yourself.  Quickly assess who needs assistance first.  Do not move victims unless they are in a dangerous situation.  If the victim is conscious ask simple questions:  "What is your name?", "Are you in pain?" "Do you know the date?"  While you are doing this, make sure someone else is calling 911 for assistance.  If other people are around,  instruct them to make sure traffic is diverted to avoid more problems.

If someone is bleeding, try to find a clean cloth and apply direct pressure to the area.  Do not worry about hurting them if there is a wound.  The victim will not feel the pressure as pain and it may just save their life as blood loss is one of the more serious outcomes of trauma.  Try to be reassuring as much as possible with statements like, "You are going to be OK", "Help is on the way", "I will stay with you, don't worry".

If there are many victims try to deal with the most seriously injured first.  Try to keep the victims on the ground (sitting or lying) and calm.

Today, I practiced all of these techniques.  I  stopped the facial bleeding (with her own scarf)  and made sure there were no serious hidden injuries.  I assessed a broken hand and that there was no obvious neck or head injury.  She was crying but was able to answer simple questions.  I kept the victim quiet and reassured as much as possible until the paramedics arrived to transport her to the hospital.

It is unlikely you would be able to administer CPR at an accident scene.  Most victims that are unconscious are not flat on the ground where chest compressions can be given.  It is better not to move someone from the car until professional help arrives.

I will probably not know how this accident or the young woman who was hurt turned out.  When the paramedics arrived, I just removed myself from the scene and went on with my busy day.


Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Alternatives to Komen Foundation

Sometimes my fellow health bloggers get it so right...the best thing I can do for my readers is steer them to another blog.  And that is what I am doing.

The Blog That Ate Manhattan is written by Dr. P. and she did a great job of pointing out that we can still donate to the fight against breast cancer, now that the Komen Foundation has shown their true political leanings.  That debacle will certainly be a classic case study in how you can shut down a money-making brand in one day.  First it was a wrong decision by the board of directors, followed by their silence in the face of an internet storm.  Wasn't anyone paying attention to the "Arab Spring"?  The power of the people is strong.

Ah, but I digress.

Check out TBTAM and see how many other choices are out there besides fake pink.

Monday, February 6, 2012

Social Network Medicine is a Bad Idea

I like social networking as much as the next person and as an "early adopter" medical blogger no one can accuse me of not being dialed into "The World Wide Web" or "The Facebook".  But my embracing of mobile health stops when I read about a new start up that was mentioned in the New York Times  this week.  HealthTap is a concept that I hope doesn't make it.

HealthTap is a start-up based in Palo Alto, Calif (where all good start-ups are born) and consumers can post health questions  that are answered by physicians who log on.  After this free medical advice is given,  the readers can click the agree or thank button and the most popular doctors get a "Doogie Howser Award" or a "Dr. Healthcliff Huxtable Award."  Just writing this makes me feel so cheap!

What is the  point of all of this?  I am not really sure.  There are social network features on the site and maybe they will develop games and quizzes.  There are phone numbers and maps so you can make appointments with physicians...an d of course lots of health advertising.   HealthTap  doesn't list the physicians specialty but the doctor can accumulate a "reputation level" depending upon the number of awards and "agrees" they get from other activities.  It is really corny.

The only requirement for a physician to participate (I can't imagine any busy qualified physician participating!) is that he/she has a license in the U.S.  HealthTap answers are limited to 400 characters so it is a bit like twitter advice from a stranger who may or may not have knowledge about a topic.

I don't know if this new site (mobile app available too) will catch on or not.  There does seem to be an insatiable need for medical knowledge and people do like to ask health questions and get answers for free. The problem is that credible information doesn't come in 400 character sound bites from people who just happen to have a medical degree.

I love the idea of sharing knowledge on the internet but I'm not interested in a Doogie Howser award, especially since he was a 14 year old and not even real.